If Geofumadas had 100 readers

This article reflects the statistics taken from January to October 2011 from Google Analytics, and simplified in the event that there were only 100 readers of this page. It is clear that it is a reflection of the Hispanic context, which would be very different if the page had a priority in another language or audience. But if the data can be useful for marketing purposes, here it goes.

Before I did an analysis of 100 cities of 10 countries, the most curious behavior is that of Mexico, which now surpasses Spain, an issue that was to be expected since in terms of population there is a notable difference, although not in connectivity. There is also a notable decline in English-speaking audiences, in part because Get well More searches of the Anglo-Saxon environment represented by the United States, United Kingdom, Australia and India.

This would be the behavior per country.

21 Mexicans

20 Spanish

11 Peruvians

8 Colombians

7 Argentinos

7 Chileans

4 Venezuelans

4 Ecuadorians

3 Bolivianos

3 Hondurans

12 would come from other countries

If the measurement were by cities:

The behavior is quite different, because although 8 countries are those that make up 88% of Hispanic traffic, in terms of cities the 10 main cities barely reach 33%, which suggests that in the Hispanic context there is a high traffic of cities that are not capitals. There is also a mess caused in Tegucigalpa, which is not a bigger and more connected city than Guatemala but being the site born in this country, it brings a lot of traffic for scattered topics on Google.hn ranging from love advice to pornography. It is striking Lima where the eGeomate translator resides and that should not cause a distortion in the statistics, but where there is an interesting euphoria over the geospatial issue and also because this country has a characteristic of migration from the countryside to the city little less than disastrous.

7 would be from Lima

4 from Mexico City

4 of Bogotá

4 of Madrid

4 of Santiago

2 from Buenos Aires

2 of Barcelona

2 of Tegucigalpa

2 of Quito

2 of Caracas

67 would come from other cities in the world

If it were by browser:

40 would still use Internet Explorer

29 would be lovers of Firefox

27 already passed to Chrome

2 would use Safari

1 would use Opera

1 would be the surplus that uses little extended options like Mozilla compatible agent on mobile, Android browser, Opera Mini, Internet Explorer with Chrome frame and RockMelt.

Here we see how Chrome keeps gaining visitors, That's what I said a few days ago I think in a couple of years will have overcome Firefox not because this loses visits but because Internet Explorer will be barely in an 28%.

In the case of interests by which users arrive:

15 would do it by AutoCAD

8 by Google Earth

6 by UTM coordinate themes

6 by ArcGIS or ArcView

3 by Microstation

2 by gvSIG

36 would do it by various combinations, including these topics but not with the direct word in the search phrase. From this I made an article earlier that compared the Value of the software In the traffic of Geofumadas.

If it were by operating system

Here we see that Mac is still a minority platform, although there is no Hollywood movie where a little apple is not shown. It is also seen that mobile traffic is a minority.

95 would use Windows

2 would use Macintosh

2 Linux

1 would use a mobile operating system

The distribution of this 1 using mobile platforms

On this side it is notorious how Mac dominates the mobile market, if we consider that they are 100 people, 72 use Apple devices if we add iPad, iPhone and iPod. If the trend is that the desktop is going to move to mobile tools, gadgets and we will depend more on the web, then the next giant will be Mac, it is a matter of time and Steve Jobs legacy.

45 would do it through an iPad

23 by means of an iPhone

18 using an Android

5 BlackBerry

4 surprisingly using an iPod

4 using a SymbianOS

1 still uses Nokia

The rounding does not even reach 1 the rest is distributed among those who use Windows Mobile, Sony and Samsung.

If I measure myself:

I am one of three that connect from a country listed in the first list.

One of two coming from a city on the second list

Unlike the readers, I am the writer and currently I use AutoCAD as much as Microstation, gvSIG more than ArcGIS, Google Earth / Maps ... every day.

One of 27 using Chrome as browser

One of 95 that use Windows, although I also connect a lot from the mobile.

One of the 45 using iPad.

The article also reminds us that we are privileged people who connect from connected cities, if we appear on the list. If our operating system, country or city is not listed there, much more privileged. In many cases one of the geographic minority that uses software and hardware of the majority, so it happens to me.